<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Wear a Respirator?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://db1-wwonline.blue.augusthome.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/</link>
	<description>An online source of information for the connected woodworker.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-10681</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-10681</guid>
		<description>Jon, 

This is a great question. Here is the information I could dig up on the P100 pancake filter that I use with the half-mask respirator (it comes from OSHA's website):

"...Under the new NIOSH criteria, the filter materials for these respirators are tested at a flow rate of 85 L/minute for penetration by particles with a median aerodynamic diameter of approximately 0.3 um. Three categories of filter (N, R, and P) are designated, each with three levels of filter efficiency (95%, 99%, and 99.97%) for a total of nine respirator classes. The three levels of filter efficiency include the Type 100 (99.97% efficient), Type 99 (99% efficient), and the Type 95 (95% efficient)..."

I'm waiting to hear from 3M to see if they have a filter that meets your standard of .03 microns. 

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, </p>
<p>This is a great question. Here is the information I could dig up on the P100 pancake filter that I use with the half-mask respirator (it comes from OSHA&#8217;s website):</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Under the new NIOSH criteria, the filter materials for these respirators are tested at a flow rate of 85 L/minute for penetration by particles with a median aerodynamic diameter of approximately 0.3 um. Three categories of filter (N, R, and P) are designated, each with three levels of filter efficiency (95%, 99%, and 99.97%) for a total of nine respirator classes. The three levels of filter efficiency include the Type 100 (99.97% efficient), Type 99 (99% efficient), and the Type 95 (95% efficient)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to hear from 3M to see if they have a filter that meets your standard of .03 microns. </p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-10669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-10669</guid>
		<description>Any advice on what filter is "sufficient" to protect a woodworker against dust?  I have heard that you should have protection down to .03 microns, but have never seen a filter that works to that level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any advice on what filter is &#8220;sufficient&#8221; to protect a woodworker against dust?  I have heard that you should have protection down to .03 microns, but have never seen a filter that works to that level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-9917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodworkingonline.com/2007/11/08/do-you-wear-a-respirator/#comment-9917</guid>
		<description>I can't imagine not using a respirator of some kind. As a Respiratory Therapist, the dangers and resulting desease processes that can occurs from inhalation of sawdust and other particulates is something we see on a daily basis. Fibrotic lung issues can be avoided by using a respirator. I think you have to ask yourself what's the bigger inconvience, not breathing or putting on the mask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine not using a respirator of some kind. As a Respiratory Therapist, the dangers and resulting desease processes that can occurs from inhalation of sawdust and other particulates is something we see on a daily basis. Fibrotic lung issues can be avoided by using a respirator. I think you have to ask yourself what&#8217;s the bigger inconvience, not breathing or putting on the mask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
